![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/IMG_0442_1.JPG)
价格先决,CP首选之战入门电竞主机相信玩家还是会以预算跟价格为第一优先,挑选CP值较高的产品来使用,AMD与Intel的战争这两年来越演越烈,当然得利的就是消费者,这次要拿比较入门的组合来PK一下,AMD平台采用AMD Ryzen 3 2200G搭配B450晶片组(总价格约NT$5280元),Intel则是采用Intel Core i3-9100F搭配B360M晶片组与NVIDIA GT1030显卡(总价格约NT$8420元),这两个组合有NT$3100元的价差,究竟效能表现差异多少,是不是该省下这NT$3000元的差价呢?相信许多玩家一定很好奇,马上就来看这次的PK赛啦。
PK平台一览▼AMD Ryzen 3 2200G搭配ASUS PRIME B450M-K主机板,AMD平台皆为处理器与记忆体可超频,所以可透过超频提升效能表现
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/IMG_0435.JPG)
▼Intel Core i3-9100F搭配ASUS PRIME B360-K主机板与ASUS GT1030 2GB GDDR5显卡,Core i3-9100F处理器记忆体仅能支援到DDR4-2400且处理器为不可超频
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/IMG_0434.JPG)
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-9100F搭配NVIDIA GT1030 本次测试使用AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-9100F搭配NVIDIA GT1030进行比较,测试软体部分会采用CineBench R15、CineBench R20、New 3DMark Time Spy/Fire Strike Extreme/Cloud Gate/Sky Diver/Night Raid、虹彩六号、全境封锁2与末日之战,马上就来看这精采的PK赛
▼虹彩六号游戏设置解析度为1920*1080,画质部分设定如下
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/RSS.JPG)
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/RSS_1.JPG)
▼全境封锁2游戏设置解析度为1920*1080,画质部分设定为低
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/Tom.JPG)
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/Tom_1.JPG)
▼末日之战游戏设置解析度为1920*1080,画质部分设定为低
AMD Ryzen 5 2200G预设时脉测试CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Cooler: AMD Wraith Stealth散热器
MB: ASUS PRIME B450M-K
RAM: GeIL Dragon RAM DDR4 8GB*2 @ DDR4-3000 CL16
VGA: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Storage: WD Black 1TB NVMe SSD
PSU: Seasonic FOCUS+ GOLD 550W
OS: Windows 10专业版 64 Bit
▼CineBench R15 OpenGL:69.35 fps CPU:528cb
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/R15_2200G.JPG)
▼CineBench R20 CPU:1336cb
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/R20_2200G.JPG)
▼3DMark Cloud Gate :12572
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_C_2200G.JPG)
▼3DMark Fire Strike Extreme:1287
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_FE_2200G.JPG)
▼3DMark Sky Diver :9629
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_S_2200G.JPG)
▼3DMark Night Raid :9911
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_N_2200G.JPG)
▼3DMark Time Spy :1001
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_T_2200G.JPG)
▼虹彩六号硬体效能检测
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/RSS_2200G.JPG)
▼虹彩六号游戏画面约63张
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/RSS_2200G_1.JPG)
▼全境封锁2硬体效能检测平均:39 FPS 分数:3536
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/Tom_2200G.JPG)
▼全境封锁2游戏画面约39张
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/Tom_2200G_1.JPG)
▼末日之战硬体效能检测平均:47 FPS 分数:2790
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/WWZ_2200G.JPG)
▼末日之战游戏画面约42张
AMD Ryzen 5 2200G超频测试CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G @ 3.9GHz
Cooler: AMD Wraith Stealth散热器
MB: ASUS PRIME B450M-K
RAM: GeIL Dragon RAM DDR4 8GB*2 @ DDR4-3000 CL16
VGA: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 @ 1400MHz
Storage: WD Black 1TB NVMe SSD
PSU: Seasonic FOCUS+ GOLD 550W
OS: Windows 10专业版 64 Bit
▼CineBench R15 OpenGL:73.99 fps CPU:571cb
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/R15_2200G_OC.JPG)
▼CineBench R20 CPU:1437cb
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/R20_2200G_OC.JPG)
▼3DMark Cloud Gate :14426
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_C_2200G_OC.JPG)
▼3DMark Fire Strike Extreme:1287
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_FE_2200G_OC.JPG)
▼3DMark Sky Diver :10875
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_S_2200G_OC.JPG)
▼3DMark Night Raid :10984
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_N_2200G_OC.JPG)
▼3DMark Time Spy :1144
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_T_2200G_OC.JPG)
▼虹彩六号硬体效能检测
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/RSS_2200G_OC.JPG)
▼虹彩六号游戏画面约73张
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/RSS_2200G_OC_1.JPG)
▼全境封锁2硬体效能检测平均:46 FPS 分数:4109
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/Tom_2200G_OC.JPG)
▼全境封锁2游戏画面约41张
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/Tom_2200G_OC_1.JPG)
▼末日之战硬体效能检测平均:49 FPS 分数:2922
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/WWZ_2200G_OC.JPG)
▼末日之战游戏画面约49张
Intel Core i3-9100F搭配NVIDIA GT1030测试CPU: Intel Core i3-9100F
Cooler: Intel 原厂风扇
MB: ASUS PRIME B360-K
RAM: GeIL Dragon RAM DDR4 8GB*2 @ DDR4-2400 CL16
VGA: ASUS GT1030 2GB GDDR5
Storage: WD Black 1TB NVMe SSD
PSU: Seasonic FOCUS+ GOLD 550W
OS: Windows 10专业版 64 Bit
▼CineBench R15 OpenGL:94.64 fps CPU:615cb
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/R15_9100F.JPG)
▼CineBench R20 CPU:1411cb
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/R20_9100F.JPG)
▼3DMark Cloud Gate :13367
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_C_9100F.JPG)
▼3DMark Fire Strike Extreme:1613
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_FE_9100F.JPG)
▼3DMark Sky Diver :11254
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_S_9100F.JPG)
▼3DMark Night Raid :12486
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_N_9100F.JPG)
▼3DMark Time Spy :1218
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/3DMark_T_9100F.JPG)
▼虹彩六号硬体效能检测
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/RSS_9100F.JPG)
▼虹彩六号游戏画面约81张
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/RSS_9100F_1.JPG)
▼全境封锁2硬体效能检测平均:45 FPS 分数:4048
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/Tom_9100F.JPG)
▼全境封锁2游戏画面约40张
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/Tom_9100F_1.JPG)
▼末日之战硬体效能检测平均:61 FPS 分数:3634
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/WWZ_9100F.JPG)
▼末日之战游戏画面约50张
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/pic/WWZ_9100F_1.JPG)
▼CineBench R15与R20可以看到Intel Core i3-9100F在运算上比较有优势,效能表现比较优异一点,不过在AMD Ryzen 3 2200G处理器超频后,R20小领先Intel Core i3-9100F
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/R15.jpg)
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/R20.jpg)
▼New 3DMark部分 AMD Ryzen 3 2200G未超频前有小落后,超频后则与Intel Core i3-9100F搭配GT1030效能各有千秋
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/3DMark.jpg)
▼游戏部分虹彩六号Intel Core i3-9100F搭配GT1030领先较多,全境封锁2差异并不大,末日之战则是Intel Core i3-9100F搭配GT1030小幅度领先
![](https://i2.wp.com/3cjohn.000webhostapp.com/AMD_2200G/Game.jpg)
总结看完上面的测试后可以发现AMD Ryzen 3 2200G为超频前的显卡效能落后NVIDIA GT1030,超频后则是缩小NVIDIA GT1030领先幅度,虽然效能表现Intel Core i3-9100F搭配NVIDIA GT1030组合较佳,但是代价就是需要多花NT$3100元,整体来说以CP值与价格先决的条件来看,还是AMD Ryzen 3 2200G比较有优势,且可以透过超频提升效能表现,想寻找高CP值的入门电竞主机,AMD Ryzen 3 2200G是个不错的选择,这次的PK测试就到这边,最后工商服务一下,现在购买AMD Ryzen 3 2200G可以参加AMD50周年活动,总价值50万的礼品可以抽奖,购买AMD Ryzen 5 2400G以上处理器还可以再登录兑换两款游戏!!以上资讯提供给需要的玩家参考。
喜欢我们的文章可以追踪我们,可以看到更多开箱文与业界消息
https://www.facebook.co...ardware/https://3cjohnhardwar...ess.com/