data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88cb7/88cb72b25b344c1c6e0718bdafac5ffcde0ad3ff" alt=""
2007年底最超值的新制程显示卡
莫过于Nvidia推出的8800GT 512MB与对手ATI推出的HD 3870此两款中高阶的产品
此两款显示的价格都落在250~280美金左右,属于中阶以上的价位等级,一般人可能较少会参考这个价位的产品
ATI在推出AH 3870时,同时也再推出一款HD 3850的产品,价位落在190~200美金左右
虽然效能较低一些,不过价位也实际反应在可以让更多的消费者接受的范围
为此Nvidia也很快的推出产品来做为此价为的应对
依然是效能优秀的8800GT,只不过把记忆体降为256MB,当然价格也降到220美金左右
让8800GT可以更佳普及化以外,也让这个价位中有更多的选择
产品外包装,依然是MSI一贯的风格
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ea1f/4ea1fa7bde8f5c3b189ecf7f1f08c198f358b490" alt=""
内附配件
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73a0a/73a0a6d92160c02e2d035e3918b42268deb9a816" alt=""
MSI NX8800GT T2D256E本体
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e47ec/e47ec094986e77a0eaad080e7f42f3bc0c9cdf2d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a813/0a81371e51064b483b02ffd570395cf287cc5eb5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1da7/e1da7761edc9a9a703fa8e7d25214f38d61d2e62" alt=""
PCB方面为公板设计,使用6pin外接电源
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e80a/3e80a00541368162dc3e32cc3c12d5298eddc4dd" alt=""
双DVI与多媒体输出接孔
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70edf/70edf20f02d7bf9e7798e8395aa25f99a08a78d4" alt=""
8800GT令人诟病的大概就是公板散热器
它的设计在风扇尺寸太小,导致散热效果不佳
MSI此款散热非使用公板,风扇尺寸也大许多,稍后会有温度的表现
使用铜底设计与记忆体导热胶
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ada8/5ada80cebd69d6478f13f6c56da9f8b4e474ae6d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/463af/463af4ff258e6269626746d1cf09ecdc963f914e" alt=""
排气处铝挤相当绵密
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83025/830258bdec1bee537c0df30b9f65750e0688b3fc" alt=""
代号G92晶片
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2062e/2062e43702ac4a99c80f92b3dbab6b915eb6d928" alt=""
右方公板供电设计
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa3ee/aa3ee5a0fbd8a879627eaa4662e68da42af04ada" alt=""
测试平台
CPU:INTEL Core 2 Extreme QX6800
MB: MSI P7N Diamond
DRAM:CORSAIR Dominator TWIN2X2048-8888C4D
VGA:MSI NX8800GT T2D256E
HD:Seagate 7200.10 320G
POWER:Corsair HX520W Modular Power Supply
Cooler:Thermaltake V1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6c6c/e6c6ce52e9ea6651a181ae5964647e7d49d1ccfb" alt=""
系统设定
CPU: 266X11=>2933Mhz
DRAM: DDRII 1000 CL4 3-3-9
VGA: 660/1900
3DMARK2003
预设值
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64578/645780e3e37a31dc77586947ffa5eddbbcf537ff" alt=""
1920X1200高解析度
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da7da/da7daf28bc50cb29c1404564a7ef708302558dcc" alt=""
1920X1200+4XAA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/641eb/641eb7816db690cf59eae6f76eb5cc8dc5159276" alt=""
3DMARK2005
预设值
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0da2b/0da2b4f5383b57356eea8a077753028adf74ef08" alt=""
1920X1200高解析度
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46cb8/46cb834cbdd972a115a5c966b5973836297da1a6" alt=""
1920X1200+4XAA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/316ff/316ff9c2fc7b9026dbfe4f7a6fb98fb4ccf6a323" alt=""
3DMARK2006
预设值
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/981e5/981e58804a0a68eed213dc4001c824f0416b286b" alt=""
1920X1200高解析度
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcf55/fcf55efc6247639e1bd0ca736b82ff3a331a0536" alt=""
1920X1200+4XAA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4d9f/c4d9f79f096939e3ff64665aaecc6bd5cfc3deea" alt=""
虽然是256MB的版本,3DMARK2005得分较512MB版低一些
不过在高解析度下表现也相当不错,效能衰减比起512MB版本没有太大的落差
1920X1200的高解析度下,其实使用4XAA对画质没有明显的帮助
只是为了区别效能上的表现而已
温度表现
VGA预设,室温16度
待机40度
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fd82/7fd82c234c895cd063cc1f142186a81fa98782fa" alt=""
跑完3DMARK2005后
温度53度
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d0ea/8d0eaf744051b7ad4b257951b27fd6eba6e4641a" alt=""
温度这部份的表现比起公板散热器好上不少,而且在运作时也没有太明显的噪音发出
游戏表现方面
Age Of Empires(世纪帝国III:群酋争霸 )
实际游戏中各时脉页数参考
设定值:
解析度1280X1024
其他设定皆为最高等级
VGA: 660/1900
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70674/706746f91d61434dceefc7263773385ebeb60d84" alt=""
Need For Speed Carbon(极速快感-玩命山道 )
实际游戏中各时脉页数参考
设定值:
解析度1280X1024
细节等级:最高
其余为预设值
VGA: 660/1900
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/756f0/756f0d5d09466753ccf079e6333eda59ca4bf99f" alt=""
COMPANY OF HEROES(英雄连队)
实际游戏中各时脉页数参考
设定值:
解析度1280X1024
细节等级:自订设定为最高品质
VGA: 660/1900
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bbf7/4bbf70e5cdd264c33d862095e63f532ecf98e511" alt=""
1920X1200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f62f/1f62f6923b0402947cd098b0cfc008b66e4e7a80" alt=""
Need For Speed Carbon表现落后512MB版本约5%左右
256MB版本在其他两个游戏中的表现没有明显落后512MB版本的状况
Crysis Benchmark
660/1900
1280X1024
Quality Settings:High
Overall Average FPS:35.285
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a06c/7a06ceb1b57a282cf6e61bd4e4d4eb57a514040f" alt=""
1920X1200
Quality Settings:Medium
Overall Average FPS:50.735
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2992c/2992c43d9157f6e069aada244f237cc491378512" alt=""
8800GT SLI测试
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be621/be621880957bc1ff3262584a1cc424f12e97e4f8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45820/458207cbf496e38939def1d9f027365eb135d0ee" alt=""
3DMARK2003
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb452/fb452d327ede8e97693483dbff07829503b82b2a" alt=""
3DMARK2005
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f385/5f385e80bb97984f697e0f67756a0c91c5ad87da" alt=""
3DMARK2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c56f1/c56f1eaafc24365a51d23e53cf544f397a86e6c8" alt=""
将CPU超频,比较分数的差异
CPU: 266X14=>3734Mhz
3DMARK2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1409/e14098cb6e0d68a79eede94f9b2aca7dd1f4693e" alt=""
COMPANY OF HEROES(英雄连队)
实际游戏中各时脉页数参考
设定值:
解析度1280X1024
细节等级:自订设定为最高品质
VGA: 660/1900
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56051/56051676d8c0032204376798084c780ffc088871" alt=""
1920X1200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddbd9/ddbd9769837c5984b2a64b457214d6819f1bdbae" alt=""
Crysis Benchmark
660/1900
1280X1024
Quality Settings:High
Overall Average FPS:42.72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbe85/dbe8502645ddcdde7a15ac28b96ab941764ce6f0" alt=""
1920X1200
Quality Settings:Medium
Overall Average FPS:65.96
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aed4a/aed4ac12b6abe6847aa8ca63d79206aaf36c6fa0" alt=""
8800GT 256MB版的出现,把价位再往下一个层次
此款市售价位落在7000元台币左右,比起512MB版本价差有1000~2000元台币(依品牌价位不同)
散热器方面的表现比起公板确实有不错的优势,实际使用中,也没有听到发出明显的噪音声
也可以让消费者省一笔改装散热器的费用
加上256MB在效能方面,虽然有些部份落后512MB版本的效能,不过某些环境下的表现它还是拥有"8800GT"的水准
日后若可以在降一些价格,拉高与512MB的差距,对追求效能的消费者将会有更大的吸引力
也可以相比于对手的HD3870/HD3850有更高的竞争力:)